Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

"Evangelos Haleplidis" <ehalep@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ehalep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B3A12D6CC for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 05:18:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2iHMlvSzfv0j for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 05:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9528412D6C1 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 05:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n186so131119498wmn.1 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:18:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=EeJPw+uY6kOFmmQc44iLYVr+UElT3dxMSfTc+EEMlj0=; b=cJstULNubCaoAq80jhkvcevZpf6Y8VAp2sj3FmszdXpZ8yBbg+0OJGv1yurPV7eTCb UfDC8Hz337YxVWkhn+afgBFYXGVdemeM/EYkzwravq6mTLMOLxS9MP14ooofpSnEHy3h 4kQFSCm4s7AmjlECvzV2Hcaed1xC4Smx4OGYZzyTV9NnSCfmAxXtP4rNEFpyP6CleGav +xCCyBk2RmG989hYZI3U/IREdBhBkTB0IYpLec/OJOluDFBpFQh1QSX/hZJT4j0/wseW +n2DJMZOV9B8v9CfEf4KaOPPv6DS+ETVNgwypKinNggJ59LFB8RkfmXHiK7+QLjsydSK vJYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=EeJPw+uY6kOFmmQc44iLYVr+UElT3dxMSfTc+EEMlj0=; b=kPA+gs/rpblytEhxXoOuo0nWwV64unl9WN6WZjuukENUT9uL9s1Q49X3Mg58Yh6TCM spEloGwLnlByI1VqfbTrP6AbHqkHsaQaWScpIFquEinsjW5cFz/ZoXrbglaWMc3XfKBO SdBFo8RAvWGaPtUSIDp4naPHmrdTq4SBnvQTJB3BRv01XVJoO9Ef93OZVejlLVA3UYB1 mO1P2ycR4oM++xvmRodezey6jy+40EzdvvAMSlw4ZyqbV0XoHwe/Tl9ri7Ju2BkkDTk5 DsjG4rUf4f7CwbyK19yhEOhh2i4aIMg3drKaQB0kLCD6JftpVjgF4FHupOIFeTtePb6J uXlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI2WkGBa6DMk9wPmePp53Q7PkiM32dGP31nfekEtnw/0HqHGxeBwzp0bxh4ZiqdPQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.22.74 with SMTP id 71mr19067922wmw.47.1457443111036; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:18:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EhalepXPS (ppp046176246217.access.hol.gr. [46.176.246.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js8sm2941184wjc.37.2016.03.08.05.18.28 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:18:29 -0800 (PST)
From: "Evangelos Haleplidis" <ehalep@gmail.com>
To: "'King, Daniel'" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, <sdn@irtf.org>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:18:39 +0200
Message-ID: <007701d1793d$0875d140$196173c0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6YwOgG0UA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/HqowO3VOWquK6siOW4tnlfyABlU>
Cc: shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:18:35 -0000

Greetings to the list,

I'd also like to support the adoption of this document. I agree with the
comments and suggestions already submitted.
Just three minor comments:

1. I was wondering whether it may make sense to juxtapose Fig.1 from this
draft with Fig.1 from RFC7426.
2. While you describe in text that the communication is happening between
respective planes in the strata, it may be good to showcase that in Fig.1. 
3. It may be good to explicitly discuss the difference from your draft to
ITU Y.2011. 

Regards,
Evangelos.


-----Original Message-----
From: sdn [mailto:sdn-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of King, Daniel
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 15:26
To: 'sdn@irtf.org'
Cc: shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Greetings SDN Researchers, 

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered
Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their
document: 

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 -
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-sdnrg-2.pdf
o The current version of the document -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn-04
	
We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but
specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated
with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or
indeed not.

Kind Regards, 
Dan & Kohei