Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Tue, 23 February 2016 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB931B34B2 for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:03:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQ8mJ-gt8agX for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marchena.puc.rediris.es (marchena.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EDD01B309F for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by marchena.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>) id 1aY7vw-000845-8F for sdn@irtf.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:03:00 +0100
Received: from [84.88.61.50] (unknown [84.88.61.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00B791FE32 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:02:57 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es
To: sdn@irtf.org
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> <CAH=kXvSjyNWYoK0zG28cM_NA3B-vqXQNUT3T5o291kU6tF2=_Q@mail.gmail.com> <25575_1456130984_56CACBA8_25575_2434_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE12FD9C36@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAL0pszkArJKdHF9WQQFaJOmku3rUWrO7sZcVo+e=vTv7A9g5sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
Message-ID: <56CC1233.4030408@cttc.es>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:02:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0pszkArJKdHF9WQQFaJOmku3rUWrO7sZcVo+e=vTv7A9g5sg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/N__ynKPaOXs_ULFr69LKtuqsMaw>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:03:05 -0000

On 22/02/2016 20:11, Gino Carrozzo wrote:
> Hi SDNRG-ers
>
> I also support the adoption of this document.
>

Dear all, Dan, Kohei,

Likewise, I support the adoption of the document as a starting point; I 
find the separation of service / transport stratum very appropriate and 
much needed.

Aspects IMHO worth developing are the multi-domain aspects, with 
multiple 1:1, 1:N, N:1 and N:M relationships between service stratum and 
transport stratum (i.e., use cases involving federation etc. will 
require a common framework w.r.t to the service stratum above)

As Gino mentioned, alignment with similar initiatives (ONF arch, ACTN 
within TEAS, etc.) is also an important point

Thanks
Ramon