IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

<christian.jacquenet@orange.com> Mon, 22 February 2016 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73FF1B2A7B for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:49:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pv7vaeqGj1nm for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363B01AD1A6 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 63F612DC01D; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:49:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.18]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9E4274C05D; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:49:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM34.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cba:56d0:a732:ef5a%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:49:44 +0100
From: christian.jacquenet@orange.com
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6YwFQliGAAAXM3LA=
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:49:43 +0000
Message-ID: <25575_1456130984_56CACBA8_25575_2434_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE12FD9C36@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> <CAH=kXvSjyNWYoK0zG28cM_NA3B-vqXQNUT3T5o291kU6tF2=_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH=kXvSjyNWYoK0zG28cM_NA3B-vqXQNUT3T5o291kU6tF2=_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE12FD9C36OPEXCLILMA3corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.2.22.81515
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/SphZfnSLcrLDPRw7NKlN8insTyY>
Cc: "shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp" <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "sdn@irtf.org" <sdn@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:49:53 -0000

Hello WG,

I too support the adoption of draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn as a sdnrg WG document.

Cheers,

Christian.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:26 PM, King, Daniel <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk<mailto:d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>> wrote:
Greetings SDN Researchers,

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their document:

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 - https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-sdnrg-2.pdf
o The current version of the document - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn-04

We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or indeed not.

Kind Regards,
Dan & Kohei

_______________________________________________
sdn mailing list
sdn@irtf.org<mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email