Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

"King, Daniel" <> Thu, 10 March 2016 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF512DCF4 for <>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:23:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.441
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWKPUQv7l_pI for <>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:23:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EE812DCF3 for <>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([] helo=EX-1-HT0.lancs.local) by with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <>) id 1ae77e-0003EC-SN for; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:23:50 +0000
Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-1-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::d9e8:ad10:d075:a6b6%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:23:50 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCBFA00EX0MB2lancsloca_"
From: "King, Daniel" <>
To: "''" <>
Thread-Topic: Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6YwTFM6dA
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:23:50 +0000
Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCBFA00@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCBFA00@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
x-originating-ip: []
x-iss-local-domain: 1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:23:57 -0000

Dear SDN RG'rs, 

We have seen good support for adopting draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn, including many comments for improving the document. Therefore, the SDN RG will adopt the document. Would the authors of draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn please submit a new (content unchanged) version of the I-D as "draft-irtf-sdnrg-layered-sdn-00". 

Authors, you are welcome to post a 01 version of the I-D prior of IETF 95 addressing comments made on the list during the adoption call. (I am sure the authors would like to encourage  textual contributions as well as comments.) We will assign time at IETF 95 to discuss the document: comments, ideas, issues, and plans.  

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: King, Daniel 
Sent: 15 February 2016 13:27
To: '' <>
Cc: '' <>
Subject: Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Greetings SDN Researchers, 

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their document: 

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 -
o The current version of the document -

We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or indeed not.

Kind Regards, 
Dan & Kohei