IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Christian Esteve Rothenberg <chesteve@gmail.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <chesteve@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DFC1A3B9B for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34p-5YdaSlBc for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75FD1A887F for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id z8so6606488ige.0 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fqQpqTCm/4YeqQ4aCjUkZw6YVS6fcCDeaePwzal6P34=; b=NSJ1V1SqBw73t7jZTljLuN7PYMoBYcpnY6kLviVCoWk5byRZkImQx4FXtyrsBc6G97 pH02n/YCX4gCse9/RaIWjO/+vok6G6C12XR5WYuY6qLvzwgSm+tDogPQynYeSB6zOFXG 5/61EvEKDb2foaKxJMMfwLnp6a0TgxgYEln5yDETPBgF6Zgx/kZRAbzOjY4oqcob3Kxq cWgOJXypz2PuxsCM3ZwChlm3vntRunu6y1CMNbpAUeTxJq2dhQMeto+om45ggoOgUivI wVtnouYCuNjqDs+AQ/Z/7gc9Mxc/gGZyBKJChT1yGuw2A+isoHpHvAclXHMo3cb/AZVo Pc6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fqQpqTCm/4YeqQ4aCjUkZw6YVS6fcCDeaePwzal6P34=; b=M4pppKwQIkEvhpQ8sbUr/fj6qIgOSmx8E47Wshy9nfj4N3ydS/NaHgnXjpGYc58aP+ 9wG7lHSqckOJ1eRepdmNzSNjtMsL0UY2T3QNVFQFCQyxP5YFqTAIbT8g+riet5xWsiI1 Xubr4ZgMudqgOKD9smmxp9sgcYV04NA324yvsgFmRqR4ogMycZdgixsBxIa+RL7pTnRk DOyLRUc153DC0/YEUY3jEKnu77VF0hEbFyWSIpde2gMaZsWMoW7BFol4sros3NiUmlFw vRjtXXVS1uqAkyLOjj30eXsDBzUM8SzGaYgVWygpz+53/QDuMZ6GPkUrmmD0NNYGl4xz IDbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTRXHjwEHFu2y8Fg4v68EA7qOE6ZT/j8d3PB8XUbUXBWwEtttlt0M7a5fhVJxEDPGu9tnnl6AVkKG/icA==
X-Received: by 10.50.43.133 with SMTP id w5mr15871023igl.80.1456230981182; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.204.138 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:36:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CC1233.4030408@cttc.es>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> <CAH=kXvSjyNWYoK0zG28cM_NA3B-vqXQNUT3T5o291kU6tF2=_Q@mail.gmail.com> <25575_1456130984_56CACBA8_25575_2434_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE12FD9C36@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAL0pszkArJKdHF9WQQFaJOmku3rUWrO7sZcVo+e=vTv7A9g5sg@mail.gmail.com> <56CC1233.4030408@cttc.es>
From: Christian Esteve Rothenberg <chesteve@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:36:01 -0300
Message-ID: <CAEj5p9TZHyWqFX3N+n15KzWNDKWWz_kNyuJoKa=9p7NKgt9iPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/W4v_VCo5-ueYdW4qVoHQPrgCBTc>
Cc: SDN IRTF list <sdn@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:36:24 -0000

Support.

Section on Recursiveness -> should point (relate/compare) to related
work at NFVRG: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-unify-nfvrg-recursive-programming-02

The Use Case section should be completed in the next revision.

-ch


On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> wrote:
> On 22/02/2016 20:11, Gino Carrozzo wrote:
>>
>> Hi SDNRG-ers
>>
>> I also support the adoption of this document.
>>
>
> Dear all, Dan, Kohei,
>
> Likewise, I support the adoption of the document as a starting point; I find
> the separation of service / transport stratum very appropriate and much
> needed.
>
> Aspects IMHO worth developing are the multi-domain aspects, with multiple
> 1:1, 1:N, N:1 and N:M relationships between service stratum and transport
> stratum (i.e., use cases involving federation etc. will require a common
> framework w.r.t to the service stratum above)
>
> As Gino mentioned, alignment with similar initiatives (ONF arch, ACTN within
> TEAS, etc.) is also an important point
>
> Thanks
> Ramon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sdn mailing list
> sdn@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email