[Sdn] gRPC

Hesham ElBakoury <Hesham.ElBakoury@huawei.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Hesham.ElBakoury@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA4D129400 for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:09:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L_hYOvRfOK0W for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EFF11295BE for <sdn@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DGA22041; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:09:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DFWEML501-MBB.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.179]) by dfweml702-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.176]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:09:25 -0800
From: Hesham ElBakoury <Hesham.ElBakoury@huawei.com>
To: "ejona@google.com" <ejona@google.com>
Thread-Topic: gRPC
Thread-Index: AQHSPk5p/MMlyyPI90qoVX/wzLWpAQ==
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:09:24 +0000
Message-ID: <C3855D43D6701846AD1151A536E7A05822677293@dfweml501-mbb>
References: <etPan.58275c6d.4b77d2e1.5186@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.58275c6d.4b77d2e1.5186@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.195.68.117]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C3855D43D6701846AD1151A536E7A05822677293dfweml501mbb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/jbUzDvz_aSFNQyVasfrEsoaypyU>
Cc: "sdn@irtf.org" <sdn@irtf.org>
Subject: [Sdn] gRPC
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:09:34 -0000

Hi Eric,

Do you think we can use gRPC as southbound protocol for SDN controllers.

Thanks

Hesham