[Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

"King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk> Mon, 15 February 2016 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460F61A873D for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:26:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <Fi4PpQsxLKmz>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains application/ms-tnef, .tnef, winmail.dat
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.721
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fi4PpQsxLKmz for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sideburn.lancs.ac.uk (sideburn.lancs.ac.uk []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8881A0196 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ex-0-ht0.lancs.ac.uk ([] helo=EX-0-HT0.lancs.local) by sideburn.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>) id 1aVJAc-0003Ab-5K for sdn@irtf.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:26:30 +0000
Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-0-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::7d10:114a:53b0:7f2f%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:26:30 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36EX0MB2lancsloca_"
From: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
To: "'sdn@irtf.org'" <sdn@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6Yw==
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:26:29 +0000
Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
x-originating-ip: []
x-iss-local-domain: 1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/jvnv6Ij-jTW_GZrSmWk90FJxDfs>
Cc: "shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp" <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:26:36 -0000

Greetings SDN Researchers, 

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their document: 

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 - https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-sdnrg-2.pdf
o The current version of the document - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn-04

We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or indeed not.

Kind Regards, 
Dan & Kohei