Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Fri, 19 February 2016 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2491B2DE0 for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:15:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKSKMIq9purl for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A9D1B2D02 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml704-chm.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CWA23701; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:14:59 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.225]) by dfweml704-chm ([10.193.5.141]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:14:52 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, "'sdn@irtf.org'" <sdn@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6YwDPGRUA
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:14:51 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729D59E98@dfweml706-chm>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.46.50.210]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.56C73F85.017E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 051089ce65385cd5b4e0516f20679c8c
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/s-S03LRE9ca8mJhFAAhSZnbZX4g>
Cc: "shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp" <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:15:11 -0000

Support,

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: sdn [mailto:sdn-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of King, Daniel
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 7:26 AM
To: 'sdn@irtf.org'
Cc: shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Greetings SDN Researchers, 

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their document: 

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 - https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-sdnrg-2.pdf
o The current version of the document - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn-04

We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or indeed not.

Kind Regards, 
Dan & Kohei