Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

"Bartosz Belter" <> Wed, 24 February 2016 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01E31B4898 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:08:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.179
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KX1z1AOzQKx for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:808::173:11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7891B484A for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:08:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by PSNC antivirus scanner at
Received: from DESKTOPKA8H2VB ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.9/8.14.9/MSA) with ESMTP id u1O97q1e018734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:07:55 +0100 (CET)
From: "Bartosz Belter" <>
To: "'King, Daniel'" <>, <>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:07:46 +0100
Message-ID: <018d01d16ee2$da7b6840$8f7238c0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGZJ2+seOW5NOvtPa0uv3YkXQsdvp+rdSsg
Content-Language: pl
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:08:07 -0000

Hello all,

I support the adoption of this document as a very good starting point.
As some of you already mentioned, the document lacks some strong motivation
statements. Use cases definitely should be provided in the next version +
strong links towards other WG/RGs.

Best regards
Bartosz Belter, PSNC

-----Original Message-----
From: sdn [] On Behalf Of King, Daniel
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 2:26 PM
To: '' <>
Subject: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

Greetings SDN Researchers,

At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered
Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their

o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 -
o The current version of the document -

We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but
specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be substantiated
with accompanying comments discussing why the document should be adopted, or
indeed not.

Kind Regards,
Dan & Kohei