RE: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

 > > The reason I sent my previous email was that I got the feeling
 > > from this thread that there is focus on providing a solution for
 > > the network-centric case (i.e. the network handles CAR discovery
 > > and the MN isn't involved). I wanted to point out that this
 > > solution would not be applicable to the mobile-centric case and
 > > clarify that this case is supported by MIP (v4 and v6) fast
 > > handoffs.
 > >
 > > >From the IETF meeting there was a majority who wanted to go for
 > > the mobile-centric case (i.e. where the mobile is involved and
 > > decides). Following Steve's presentation I think that became
 > > quite clear. So, why are there discussions about doing a solution
 > > which is meant for the network-centric case only? This solution
 > > wouldn't apply to the mobile-centric case. That's what I was meant
 > > to ask in my last email.
 > >
 > 
 > I don't think anybody is proposoing a solution just for the
 > network-centric
 > case now (if you are, please raise your hand).
 > 
 > The solutions for the mobile-centric case will work for the
 > network-centric
 > case too.

Seems like it was my misunderstanding and the way I posed the question.
I was trying to see whether there was agreement on the mailing list (after
agreement during the meeting) about the MN being the entity which discovers
all possible CARs, with hints from the network, and takes the decision.

/Karim

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby