Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC

Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com> Sat, 15 December 2001 23:47 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08556 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:47:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24873; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:32:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24844 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:31:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from netmail2.alcatel.com (netmail2.alcatel.com [128.251.168.51]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08471 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from auds952.usa.alcatel.com (auds952.usa.alcatel.com [143.209.238.7]) by netmail2.alcatel.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA09849 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:31:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from alcatel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by auds952.usa.alcatel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id fBFNVMm27154 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:31:23 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <3C1BDB8B.4020101@alcatel.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:23:55 -0600
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
Organization: Alcatel USA
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "'seamoby@ietf.org'" <seamoby@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC
References: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D216B@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear All,
  According to the slides presented by WG cochair on Friday Dec. 14, 
2001 at IETF 52 (these slides have to be posted for public access, as 
other WGs do), the two drafts:
draft 1. draft-sarikaya-seamoby-mipv6hp-00.txt and
draft 2. draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt
were considered together because they were submitted by the same team and
since draft-sarikaya-seamoby-mipv6hp-00.txt
was based on hmipv6 both of them were eliminated, i.e. 
draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt was not at all considered, there were no 
slides on this draft..
  This raises several concerns on my side:
- the two drafts have only two authors in common, the two draft main 
authors are different and
more importantly the two drafts define two different paging protocols.
- draft 1 is an extension of Mobile IPv6. Its dependence on hmipv6 can 
easily be removed, as we intend to do it in the next version.
- draft 2 is completely based on the architecture defined in RFC 3154. 
Apart from many other aspects, it defines paging triggers.
- draft 2 was probably the only draft that generated some discussion on 
the maling list by people who have not submitted drafts, i.e., by 
external people .
- WG cochair Jim sent us private emails providing some useful feedback 
on the definition of an API for paging triggers. He even offered to 
collaborate on a joint draft. I have the emails and willing to 
distribute them on the mailing list if asked.

  Based on the above facts I hereby declare the paging protocol 
assessment to be moot.

Regards,

-- 
Behcet 




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby