Re: [Seamoby] CAR Discovery Requirements

John,
What you ask is here is clearly an implementation issue. Whether
the protocol becomes complicated by including inter-domain discovery
is debatable. What we are looking into right now is whether there
SHOULD or MUST be support for inter-domain domain discovery. Many of
us feel it is necessary given that the Internet is  a bunch of domains
put together.

-Govind.

>At 12:47 PM 1/14/2002, James Kempf wrote:
>
> >> It would require resolving which users are subscribers of which
> >> domains or complex inter-domain roaming and billing reciprocity.
> >>
> >> While it seems reasonable to avoid locking mobile stations into a
> >> single domain, the policy interactions of requiring multiple-domain
> >> discovery would make the task much more difficult at the start.
> >
> >I'm not quite sure I understand the reasoning behind this statement.
> >How does inter-domain CAR discovery complicate roaming and billing
> >reciprocity any more than simply statically configuring the
> >inter-domain CAR routers?
>
>It is not increasing the complexity of roaming and reciprocity that
>worries me, it is the potential that requiring discovery be inter-domain
>would complicate the discovery (by drawing in these difficult issues).
>
>John
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seamoby mailing list
>Seamoby@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby