RE: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder

john.loughney@nokia.com Tue, 04 May 2004 18:22 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17665 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4QW-0003G0-Ag for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:13:56 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i44IDuZG012505 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:13:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4Kn-0001WC-50 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:08:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16595 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:07:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL4Kk-0002OR-Ps for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:07:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4Jr-0002GH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:07:04 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4Ix-000296-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:06:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4BA-0006Zr-UK; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:58:04 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL42L-0001ua-JB for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:48:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA15569 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:48:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL42J-0000Mr-7w for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:48:55 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL41M-0000Gv-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:47:57 -0400
Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL40q-0000Af-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:47:24 -0400
Received: from esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (esdks002.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.121]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i44HlNv22812; Tue, 4 May 2004 20:47:23 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Tue, 4 May 2004 20:46:53 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.30 2004040916 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i44Hkr04028131; Tue, 4 May 2004 20:46:53 +0300
Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com 00Dkck8j; Tue, 04 May 2004 20:46:51 EEST
Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.28]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i44HkoH20154; Tue, 4 May 2004 20:46:50 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Tue, 4 May 2004 20:46:49 +0300
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 20:46:48 +0300
Message-ID: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB3206360143BDA7@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder
Thread-Index: AcQx/m60HkEIwaZVRQSPnUw7hzpTLQAAUoJg
To: charliep@iprg.nokia.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com
Cc: seamoby@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2004 17:46:49.0825 (UTC) FILETIME=[C6FF2D10:01C431FF]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Charlie,

> > > 4) Is this a protocol document or a information document? If it is
> > >   info, then probably keywords (MUST; SHOULD; MAY, etc) shouldn't
> > >   be used.
> > 
> > I'll ask Allison. I've heard two stories on this, one that 
> an informational
> > or experimental document may have such normative text and 
> others that it
> > shouldn't. The doc is really just informational.
> 
> I was under the very strong impression that the document was
> intended for publication as Experimental, and in that case
> it seems clear that the 2119 keywords SHOULD be used.

I am speaking just about the IANA document, not CTP.

John

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby