RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

["Pat R. Calhoun" <[e-mail]>]

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 >  First, I have not followed the debate. However, I find
 > unacceptable 
 >  that you would tell Behcet not to voice his opinion because he is
the
 >  only one doing so. 
hmm... Correct me if I am wrong, but where did I state that Behcet
couldn't voice his opinions? That was certainly not my intention. He
is entitled to say what he wants, but that won't necessarily change
the WG's decision (and that was my point).

 >  How do you get
 >  to the conclusion that the roughly 495 who are not participating
in this
 >  debate agree with you (and not Behcet) just because they shut up?
My point here was that there are plenty of folks on this list, and if
you look at the archives, many of them certainly have voiced their
opinions many times over. I haven't heard anything from those folks
either.

 >  Can you point to one debate where the rough consensus was reached
 >  by way of more than 250 favorable opinions?
Hmmm.. Perhaps you misread my statement. Read above.

 > I have seen proposals on
 >  this list (say car discovery reqs, for instance) decided by 2
people in favor,
 >  one against. For any outcome here to make sense, shouldn't the
definition
 >  of rough consensus be consistent?
Again, read above.

PatC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPEcA+zN1fXKoxmisEQJBUgCffQTNJn1QIorXhYH9pNaRC2OShR0AmweI
y3XGSS9P8sbrVVp+sORYWuLb
=IaYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----