Re: [Seamoby] openness for advanced paging strategies in DMHA

Hello,

Marco Liebsch wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> the architecture of the Paging Agent node in the current base line draft
> for the WG's DMHA protocol intends to be open for several paging
> strategies. As James proposed, maybe it is appropriate to take detailed
> sections addressing different paging strategies and characteristics out
> for the WG's protocol framework draft. In my opinion, deployment of
> different paging strategies is an important area, therefore, the future
> WG architecture and the protocol for DMHA should allow deployment of
> several paging strategies. Therefore, I propose the following: Taking
> out the details on paging strategies and having later a reference on a
> possibly stand-alone document describing the paging strategy specifics.
> We could have a very brief comment in the draft addressing the 'role of
> a paging strategy' (sec. 1.1.4 in draft-renker) and the concept's
> openness.
>
> Comments are appreciated.
>

IMHO this would be a very efficient design choice (I mean,
supporting multiple paging policies). For two reasons (at least):
1- Seems like no paging policy suits well all mobility scenarios
2- Paging policy research is not finished (especially in IP area).

regards,
pars

>
> marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> Seamoby@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby