IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Minutes of Meeting at IETF 52

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Thu, 03 January 2002 21:20 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11591 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:20:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA20388; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:09:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA20357 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:09:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from docomolabs-usa.com (fridge.docomo-usa.com [216.98.102.228]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11338 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:09:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from T23KEMPF (dhcp126.docomo-usa.com [172.21.96.126]) by docomolabs-usa.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g03L9DS07655; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <023901c1949a$ac45bb10$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
Cc: seamoby@ietf.org
References: <015801c1948c$215efc90$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <3C34C27C.81B9852E@alcatel.com> <01eb01c19497$70b18820$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <3C34C64B.22C6FDAF@alcatel.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Minutes of Meeting at IETF 52
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:07:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Behcet Sarikaya: Do you have any slides on
draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt?
> James Kempf: No.
> (frankly speaking the above is probably not exactly what was asked and
> answered but it does reflect the semantics.)
>

How about:

Q: Was combining these a good idea?  These were completely different
proposals.
A: That is a fair statement.  We'll cover it later.

which was included in the posted minutes. I recall
your asking a question of this nature, and I do definitely recall
this having been my reply.

            jak




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status