RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC
"Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se> Mon, 17 December 2001 10:46 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA29081 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 05:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA00026; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 05:26:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA29993 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 05:26:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se (albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se [194.237.142.116]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA28973 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 05:26:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from esealnt406.al.sw.ericsson.se (ESEALNT406.al.sw.ericsson.se [153.88.251.29]) by albatross.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.11.0/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id fBHAQCJ22561 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:26:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: FROM esealnt400.al.sw.ericsson.se BY esealnt406.al.sw.ericsson.se ; Mon Dec 17 11:25:54 2001 +0100
Received: by esealnt400 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <YHKQNBF0>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:26:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4DA6EA82906FD511BE2F00508BCF053801C4C131@Esealnt861.al.sw.ericsson.se>
From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>
To: 'Behcet Sarikaya' <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>, "'seamoby@ietf.org'" <seamoby@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:25:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
> access, as > other WGs do), the two drafts: > draft 1. draft-sarikaya-seamoby-mipv6hp-00.txt and > draft 2. draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt > were considered together because they were submitted by the > same team and > since draft-sarikaya-seamoby-mipv6hp-00.txt > was based on hmipv6 both of them were eliminated, => I missed the early part of the meeting, but was that a reason ?? ie, just because it's based on HMIPv6 ? Hesham _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presenta… Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presenta… James Kempf