Re: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

> The reason I sent my previous email was that I got the feeling
> from this thread that there is focus on providing a solution for
> the network-centric case (i.e. the network handles CAR discovery
> and the MN isn't involved). I wanted to point out that this
> solution would not be applicable to the mobile-centric case and
> clarify that this case is supported by MIP (v4 and v6) fast
> handoffs.
>
> >From the IETF meeting there was a majority who wanted to go for
> the mobile-centric case (i.e. where the mobile is involved and
> decides). Following Steve's presentation I think that became
> quite clear. So, why are there discussions about doing a solution
> which is meant for the network-centric case only? This solution
> wouldn't apply to the mobile-centric case. That's what I was meant
> to ask in my last email.
>

I don't think anybody is proposoing a solution just for the
network-centric
case now (if you are, please raise your hand).

The solutions for the mobile-centric case will work for the
network-centric
case too.

            jak

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby