Re: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

Hi, Behcet,

Thanks for the information.
My understanding is that the low latency handoff proposal ASSUMES or
REQUIRES that such L2 triggers are available. Then the question would be how
such L2 triggers containing the IP address of the nFA could be generated. I
don't think we have a general solution for the problem yet. So I don't think
we can say "Look! we have L2 triggers that provide the IP address of the
target access router." yet.

I understand the need to design a way to get L2 ID to IP address mapping was
one of the major motivations for the CAR discovery protocol while we know
that the MN can get the L2 ID of the new base station from the L2 beacons.
Actually the CAR discovery protocol could be used to construct the L2
trigger message required/assumed in the draft.

Regards,

Eunsoo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Behcet Sarikaya" <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
To: <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

>
>
> Eunsoo Shim wrote:
>
> >Hi, Karim,
> >
> >What kind of L2 triggers provide the IP address(es) of the target
> >(candidate) access routers?
> >
>
http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-0
3.txt
> states that the triggers L2-MT and L2-ST and L2-LU have nFA IP address
> as parameters.
> Hope this helps.
>
> --behcet
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> Seamoby@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby