RE: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

 > I wasn't
 > >ruling out network involvement, but I couldn't understand why there
 > >was work on ARs only doing CAR discovery. Hope my point is 
 > more clear
 > >now. Maybe I misinterpreted some emails and people are in agreement
 > >with this. I think Dirk's email at least was in line with what I
 > >have above (i.e. we need to focus on the MN's role and allow the
 > >network to assist where needed).
 > 
 > [Govind] The main point is that the MNs requirements should be
 > taken into consideration when deciding on the TARs whether this
 > happens in the network or in the MN is upto the individual solution
 > (as long as it satisfies the requirements).
 > Hope these clarifies your concerns.

Sorry I'm falling behind on this discussion and haven't read all the emails,
but the point was that the decision is to be taken by the MN, not by the
network. So what you write above about the decision happening in the network
does not follow from the discussion so far. The MN should take the decision
with hints from the network, not the other way round.

/K.

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby