RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

"Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se> Thu, 17 January 2002 17:42 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27879 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:42:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13611; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13561 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se (penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se [194.237.142.110]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27146 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from esealnt462.al.sw.ericsson.se (ESEALNT462.al.sw.ericsson.se [153.88.251.62]) by penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.11.0/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id g0HHL5K18604 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:21:05 +0100 (MET)
Received: FROM esealnt742.al.sw.ericsson.se BY esealnt462.al.sw.ericsson.se ; Thu Jan 17 18:20:48 2002 +0100
Received: by esealnt742.al.sw.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <YHKCN2XC>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:12:04 +0100
Message-ID: <4DA6EA82906FD511BE2F00508BCF053801C4C21A@Esealnt861.al.sw.ericsson.se>
From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>
To: "'Pat R. Calhoun'" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>, 'Cedric Westphal' <cedric@IPRG.nokia.com>
Cc: 'Behcet Sarikaya' <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:20:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19F7B.4CC30E90"
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org

I don't want to take sides here since I'm not following 
the paging proposals and do not have an opinion on 
proposal X vs proposal Y, but really why are you having a numbering 
system if you're not going to follow it ???? 
What's the point of these numbers anyway if they are
(obviously) based on different criteria from those that 
the 'winning' protocol is assessed on ?
 
Seems very strange. 
 
Hesham