Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

Hesham,

You are right. The numbering system was an experiment
that didn't work. It was meant to help the assessment
team, it only served to confuse the issue.

I will take the actual numbers out of the draft
and substitute a nonnumeric indication
of the status of the draft on particular
requirements.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>
To: "'Pat R. Calhoun'" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>; "'Cedric
Westphal'" <cedric@IPRG.nokia.com>
Cc: "'Behcet Sarikaya'" <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>;
<seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

> I don't want to take sides here since I'm not following
> the paging proposals and do not have an opinion on
> proposal X vs proposal Y, but really why are you having a numbering
> system if you're not going to follow it ????
> What's the point of these numbers anyway if they are
> (obviously) based on different criteria from those that
> the 'winning' protocol is assessed on ?
>
> Seems very strange.
>
> Hesham
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby