IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

Cedric Westphal <cedric@iprg.nokia.com> Thu, 17 January 2002 19:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA00614 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:06:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18048; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:54:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18015 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:54:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA00311 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:54:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (darkstar.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.69]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3-GLGS) with ESMTP id KAA02740; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id g0HIsMY26519; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:54:22 -0800
X-mProtect: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:54:22 -0800 Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection
Received: from mvdhcp14160.americas.nokia.com (172.18.141.60, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdNvkn6s; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:54:20 PST
Message-ID: <3C471DD6.6090302@iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:54:14 -0800
From: Cedric Westphal <cedric@iprg.nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
CC: "Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>, 'Behcet Sarikaya' <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description
References: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D2343@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com> <3C46FF96.6010606@iprg.nokia.com> <00f501c19f81$a767cd80$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jim,

my point was that there is no clear support either in favor of the decision
besides, I quote from you mail "in [your] judgement, the WG is satisfied 
with the decision".
The only claim to support this satisfaction is that, I paraphrase, 
'people are vocal on
this list, and would have said so if they disagreed' and the only 3 
voices (all against)
should not be counted as they are not many enough. Well, the argument 
could be
turned around, the same vocal people would have said so had they agreed.
As long as the WG is silent, I don't see why you should interprete this 
silence as
supporting your point of view, and not Behcet's.

 (for one, I have not given any opinion on whether or not draft-renker 
should be the design basis, not because I agree with you or Behcet, but 
because I don't have any opinion on this
specific question. I do feel wronged whenever I read that my silence 
supports either
side in this debate).

Cedric.



_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status