IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft

Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com> Sat, 22 December 2001 17:14 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA00987 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:14:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA20990; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:02:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA20962 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:02:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thumper.research.telcordia.com (thumper.research.telcordia.com [128.96.41.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA00838 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:02:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tari.research.telcordia.com (tari [207.3.232.66]) by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fBMH1IUq004696; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:01:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (tari.research.telcordia.com [207.3.232.66]) by tari.research.telcordia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13407; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:01:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:00:10 -0500
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft
Message-ID: <20011222160010.GA983@catfish>
Mail-Followup-To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>, Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
References: <20011221000542.GE1492@catfish> <021401c18a56$97540110$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <20011221203645.GD709@catfish> <033301c18a73$44673090$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <20011221230244.GA1194@catfish> <002f01c18aae$55984670$8e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002f01c18aae$55984670$8e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
From: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000414(IM141)
Lines: 54
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org

Jim,

I understand the reason of the ratings for draft-ohba on the
requirements that were said to be focused during the judgement phase.

But it is still not clear why draft-renker is selected even based on
the focused requirements, since the rating for draft-renker on each of 
those requirements are not the highest (see below).  


   |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------|
   |            | Ref. [3]   | Ref. [4]    |    Refs.    | Ref. [5]   |
   |            |            |             |-------------|            |
   |            |            |             | [6]     [7] |            |
   |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------|


   (snip)

   |    4.6     |            |             |             |            |
   | Multiple   |            |             |  4/2     1  |            |
   | Dormant    |    2       |     1       |             |     2      |
   |  Modes     |            |             |             |            | 
   |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------|

   (snip)

   |    4.7     |            |             |             |            |
   |Independence|            |             |  1       4  |            |
   | of Mobility|    4       |     3       |             |     4      |
   | Protocols  |            |             |             |            |
   |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------|

   (snip)

   |    4.12    |            |             |             |            |
   | Orthogonal-|            |             |  4       4  |            |
   | ity of PA  |     4      |     1       |             |     2      |
   | and subnets|            |             |             |            |
   |------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------| 

   (snip)


> Would you find it satisfactory if, as Jari suggested, some text
> is inserted into the assessment draft explaining how the final
> decision was made?
> 
>             jak

Yes.

Thanks,
Yoshihiro Ohba

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status