IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Tue, 04 May 2004 18:34 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19009 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4cj-0006oo-6q for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:26:33 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i44IQX1S026205 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:26:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4ZL-0005jK-B7 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:23:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17687 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL4ZI-00041V-Rw for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:23:00 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4YS-0003th-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:22:09 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4Xc-0003lw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:21:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4Pc-0002tN-Vn; Tue, 04 May 2004 14:13:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL4Ck-0006yy-2E for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:59:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16047 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:59:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL4Ch-0001RA-MN for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:59:39 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4Bj-0001Kd-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:58:39 -0400
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL4Ak-0001BB-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:57:38 -0400
Message-ID: <012f01c43201$607e9100$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: john.loughney@nokia.com, charliep@iprg.nokia.com
Cc: seamoby@ietf.org
References: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB3206360143BDA7@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 10:58:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John,

Allison says we should make the IANA document experimental as well, and that
RFC 2119 language in it is fine.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <john.loughney@nokia.com>
To: <charliep@iprg.nokia.com>; <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder


Charlie,

> > > 4) Is this a protocol document or a information document? If it is
> > >   info, then probably keywords (MUST; SHOULD; MAY, etc) shouldn't
> > >   be used.
> >
> > I'll ask Allison. I've heard two stories on this, one that
> an informational
> > or experimental document may have such normative text and
> others that it
> > shouldn't. The doc is really just informational.
>
> I was under the very strong impression that the document was
> intended for publication as Experimental, and in that case
> it seems clear that the 2119 keywords SHOULD be used.

I am speaking just about the IANA document, not CTP.

John



_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email