IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Thu, 17 January 2002 01:04 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24998 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:04:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA26692; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:48:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA26665 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:47:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from docomolabs-usa.com (fridge.docomo-usa.com [216.98.102.228]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24777 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:47:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from T23KEMPF (dhcp126.docomo-usa.com [172.21.96.126]) by docomolabs-usa.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0H0lPv00643; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <031001c19ef0$4e3f1060$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
References: <018c01c19ec7$6d761420$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <3C45E485.2010400@alcatel.com> <022701c19ed6$6646a3e0$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <3C4616E3.6060407@alcatel.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:45:48 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Behcet,

> Several people not authors of proposals (Vijay, Rene) voiced their
> concern on the murky assessment, or am I wrong, or are you waiting for
> the sky to fall down?
>

The text I've posted was intended to clarify how the decision
was made. If there are any further concerns expressed, then
we can discuss them.

> To be on the positive side, we can offer Majordomo based mailing list
> support for the design team, if only with no WG draft.
>

Thanx for the offer, but I believe we will stick with current WG
draft.


            jak


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status