RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed
"Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 16:46 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13699 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07825; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07794 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from EXCHSRV.stormventures.com ([65.107.25.226]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13132 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: by EXCHSRV.stormventures.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <CWXKCFK4>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:27:41 -0800
Message-ID: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D231D@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com>
From: "Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>
To: 'Phil Neumiller' <pneumiller@meshnetworks.com>, manet@itd.nrl.navy.mil, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:27:36 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19EAA.B5757FD0"
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I brought this topic up with the ADs again yesterday, and there seems to be agreement that such a document is necessary. However, it would be useful if this document also included the security terminology that we use, since it conflicts with some of the terms used WGs in other areas (e.g. IPSec). PatC - -----Original Message----- From: Phil Neumiller [mailto:pneumiller@meshnetworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:39 AM To: manet@itd.nrl.navy.mil; seamoby@ietf.org Subject: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Hi, I have seen Charlie pull out the terminology draft at least a few times! :-) Why can't some WG chair in SeaMoby or MANET adopt it as WG draft? http://people.nokia.net/~charliep/txt/seamoby/term.txt It seems that many times arguments are over terminology. IMO, I would like to the SeaMoby WG become a bridge between MANET and MIP technologies, especially with respect to AR discovery and CT. This terminology draft would make a very nice addition to the SeaMoby WG draft list. Best regards, Phil _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPEWp+DN1fXKoxmisEQKpKwCgsuQlnVlOxREcl5hKPmD76ZrjI74AoLNh bL1hxFHUR1waVYM8pGeJbZW/ =JrHd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Phil Neumiller
- RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Frank Kargl
- RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki)
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Jukka Manner
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed Jukka Manner
- [Seamoby] RE: Terminology Draft Needed Scott Corson