RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed

"Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 16:46 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13699 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07825; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07794 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from EXCHSRV.stormventures.com ([65.107.25.226]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13132 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:28:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: by EXCHSRV.stormventures.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <CWXKCFK4>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:27:41 -0800
Message-ID: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D231D@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com>
From: "Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>
To: 'Phil Neumiller' <pneumiller@meshnetworks.com>, manet@itd.nrl.navy.mil, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:27:36 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19EAA.B5757FD0"
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I brought this topic up with the ADs again yesterday, and there seems
to be agreement that such a document is necessary. However, it would
be useful if this document also included the security terminology
that we use, since it conflicts with some of the terms used WGs in
other areas (e.g. IPSec).

PatC

- -----Original Message-----
From: Phil Neumiller [mailto:pneumiller@meshnetworks.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:39 AM
To: manet@itd.nrl.navy.mil; seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed


Hi,

I have seen Charlie pull out the terminology draft at least a few
times! :-)  Why can't 
some WG chair in SeaMoby or MANET adopt it as WG draft?

http://people.nokia.net/~charliep/txt/seamoby/term.txt

It seems that many times arguments are over terminology.  IMO, I
would like to 
the SeaMoby WG become a bridge between MANET and MIP technologies, 
especially with respect to AR discovery and CT.  This terminology
draft would make a very nice addition to the SeaMoby WG draft list.  

Best regards,

Phil


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPEWp+DN1fXKoxmisEQKpKwCgsuQlnVlOxREcl5hKPmD76ZrjI74AoLNh
bL1hxFHUR1waVYM8pGeJbZW/
=JrHd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----