[Seamoby] Re: IP Paging Protocol

Hi James,

  There has been a new development (Pls see the email that was forwarded 
to you).
 It seems now clear that there is no longer a consensus on draft-renker. 
I think that this draft can not be taken as WG document, and therefore 
serve as base.
  The assessment draft drafy-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt 
did not identify a clear winner but it seems that it has identified a 
clear loser (the renker draft)  in terms the marks given (72 marks 
versus 89, 90, etc).

  Here is the way out:

>We believe that the process of creating an IP paging protocol can be
>> substantially improved, and that the establishment in Seamoby of a
>> design team comprising the authors of the current proposal and few
>> other relevant parties is the only realistic solution (as it has
>> already happened in other IETF WGs). 
>

Regards,

-- 
Behcet 

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby