IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

"Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com> Thu, 17 January 2002 17:37 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27732 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:37:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13857; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:26:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13828 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from EXCHSRV.stormventures.com ([65.107.25.226]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27276 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by EXCHSRV.stormventures.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <CWXKCG2V>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:25:27 -0800
Message-ID: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D2356@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com>
From: "Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>
To: "'Hesham Soliman (ERA)'" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>, 'Cedric Westphal' <cedric@IPRG.nokia.com>
Cc: 'Behcet Sarikaya' <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:24:22 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19F7B.CE076730"
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

IMHO numbers are irrelevant. What counts here is whether the protocol
matches up against the requirements. We picked the one that was the
closest, based on the input from the assessment team.
 
PatC

- -----Original Message-----
From: Hesham Soliman (ERA) [mailto:hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Pat R. Calhoun; 'Cedric Westphal'
Cc: 'Behcet Sarikaya'; seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description


I don't want to take sides here since I'm not following 
the paging proposals and do not have an opinion on 
proposal X vs proposal Y, but really why are you having a numbering 
system if you're not going to follow it ???? 
What's the point of these numbers anyway if they are
(obviously) based on different criteria from those that 
the 'winning' protocol is assessed on ?
 
Seems very strange. 
 
Hesham


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPEcIxjN1fXKoxmisEQIr5QCgsWwgPX40EZN6BwAeut/LgaG5SIoAoObH
DodVWjoI6EL8uOqzllISZN2u
=OaLx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status