[Seamoby] proposal on next steps in paging

Dear all,

in order to proceed with DMHA protocol specification, I propose the
following:
Since the current base-line document is maybe a bit overloaded for being
the first Seamoby WG draft, I will take out the Mobile IPv6 specific
options out of the main part, but keep the generic explicit signaling in
the document. Mobile IPv6 specific optimization could be kept in the
documents annex or in a separate document (what do you think?).
Furthermore, my opinion is that the concept should allow deployment of
several paging strategies, as currently described in the draft. But
maybe it is reasonable to extract the sections on paging strategies out
of the current draft keeping them in a separate document, which could be
further evaluated and extended. This would allow to get a first
framework draft, which is clearly arranged and open for further
specification of open issues.
What about the following:
Coming up with a first famework draft end of January, possibly having
some further ideas and issues already addressed by then. Then we have
about one month in order to prepare a second version ready for
submission right in time for IETF#53.

First issues to be addressed with respect to the base-line concept
should be the issues described in the assessment draft. Maybe this is a
good starting point for proceeding. As mentioned in Salt Lake already,
all protocol proposals have very good ideas, which should be discussed
and considered to be folded into a common WG DMHA protocol draft.
Comments are appreciated.

I am looking forward to working with you all on bringing the DMHA
protocol specification ahead.

Regards,

Marco

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby