Re: [Seamoby] IESG review of car discovery issues, AD review, and...

Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Sun, 29 September 2002 03:38 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA17275 for <seamoby-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8T3drv30858; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:39:53 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8T3chv30830 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:38:43 -0400
Received: from psg.com (smmsp@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA17262 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mankin by psg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17vUuc-000MeF-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:38:30 -0700
To: dirk.trossen@nokia.com, govind.krishnamurthi@nokia.com, hemant.chaskar@nokia.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com, mankin@psg.com, seamoby@ietf.org, sob@harvard.com
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] IESG review of car discovery issues, AD review, and...
Message-Id: <E17vUuc-000MeF-00@psg.com>
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:38:30 -0700
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Jim,

With draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-03.txt so nearly
approved, if the editors take Steve's new text or something like
it, and also address my two comments with small text changes
in an -04 draft, I can approve the i-d.  What should happen
is that at submission time, someone should send a note to
the working group describing the diffs and why, so the working
group can see if they have any concerns.  

Let me know when you have processed, as you say, or if there
is a specific question/concern.

Thanks.

Allison

> 
> Thanx for the comments. We tried in the requirements to address security but it
> sounds like we were not specific enough in the problem statement. Skimming
> through Steve's comments, they look good but I think we will require some
> additional time to process. The design team will certainly take all the IESG
> comments into account during their deliberations. Meanwhile, Govind will work 
> to make sure the requirements and problem statement address the concerns expressed
> by the IESG.
> 
>             jak
_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby