Re: [Seamoby] CT Requirements Comments from IESG

It's not the same definition

I suggest:

5.5.2 A context update MUST preserve the integrity, and thus the
      intended useability, of the context at each receiving AR.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Kenward" <gkenward@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "'James Kempf'" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CT Requirements Comments from IESG

> A word is often defined as 4 bytes, or 32 bits :-) in many
> computational architectures and programming languages.
> 
> Neither here nor there, really. I'll wait for further
> suggestions/comments on the working of 5.5.2 from the wg.
> 
> Gary
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
> > Sent: July 10, 2002 14:12
> > To: Kenward, Gary [WDLN2:AN10:EXCH]; seamoby@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CT Requirements Comments from IESG
> > 
> > 
> > "Word" or "phrase", from the definition you cite, typically 
> > applies to natural language. I have not heard anyone use that
> > terminology for machine readable information, even in 
> > programming languages.
> > 
> >             jak
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gary Kenward" <gkenward@nortelnetworks.com>
> > To: "'James Kempf'" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; <seamoby@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:58 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CT Requirements Comments from IESG
> > 
> > 
> 
> *snip*
> 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby