Re: [Seamoby] IP Paging ]Framework discussion

Hi Jim,
  You still have not posted the slides neither the minutes. How many times
should I ask this?
  My point is very simple. Here is someone who was brought on board to
cochair a WG in order to help in the protocol assessment of paging
proposals. This person has very many opinions. He makes sure to give a reply
to any message posted on the mailing list.
  However this same person somehow forgets to make any opinion on one the
paging proposals jeopardizing the assessment process.
  He seems to admit this and asks some way out on the one hand and he
insists on the false conclusion of the assessment on the other hand.
  The above is too good to believe. What do you think?

  The fact is that the assesment process is wrong. All IETF WGs receive
several protocol proposals, Seamoby is not the only WG. However the process
used by Seamoby is unique to Seamoby.
  Jim, I am ready to discuss this issue over the phone. My phone number is
below. Feel free to call me or give your phone number I am going to call
you.

Regards,

--
Behcet Sarikaya
Network Strategy Group, Mobile Networking Team
Alcatel USA M/S 026
1000 Coit Road PB7,
Plano, TX 75075
Email : behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com
Phone : (972) 477-2794 Fax : (972) 519-2460

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby