Re: [Seamoby] Minutes for Meeting at IETF 53

> To put a somewhat diverging comment, the low-latency handoff proposal
of the
> MobileIP WG requires the L2 triggers (L2-MT, L2-ST) contain the IP
address
> of the nFA. So in the scenario of the proposal, the mapping should
happen
> before the L2 trigger message is composed. Actually I prefer having L2
> triggers with just L2 identifiers and then doing the mapping as you
> described in the below.
> Thanks.
>

The L2 triggers require some identifier. In general, I would think that
this would be an L2 identifier, but for particular L2s where it is
possible to provide the IP address and the network topology is fixed, it
could also be the IP address. The prototype IS-2000 RAN work falls into
the latter case. It is just a further optimization.

            jak

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby