RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement
john.loughney@nokia.com Sun, 14 July 2002 22:08 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA18484 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:08:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA08767; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:01:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA08732 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:01:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgw-x2.nokia.com (mgw-x2.nokia.com [131.228.20.22]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA18261 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from esvir04nok.ntc.nokia.com (esvir04nokt.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.36]) by mgw-x2.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.1/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id g6EM1ri07695 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:01:53 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com (unverified) by esvir04nok.ntc.nokia.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id <T5c18316b23ac158f24077@esvir04nok.ntc.nokia.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:01:23 +0300
Received: from esebe004.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.44]) by esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:01:22 +0300
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:01:22 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <0C1353ABB1DEB74DB067ADFF749C4EEFD38EC2@esebe004.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement
Thread-Index: AcIrfx7Kw2nHmcEKTWWI4+NF0z9YWQAAfF5Q
To: kempf@docomolabs-usa.com, seamoby@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2002 22:01:22.0978 (UTC) FILETIME=[FDDE6020:01C22B81]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id SAA08733
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi James,
> "Out of scope" is typically WG charter language. I know the
> SHOULD/SHOULD NOT sounds a bit funny, but I think we need to
> express this in a way that is more requirements language.
Then how about changing:
... the CT solution need
not support it, but it should not provide a hinderance to those feature contexts
that do.
to:
... the CT solution is not requireed to directly support synchronization, but
may support simple methods for the synchronization context for feature contexts
that do.
John
_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement john.loughney
- Re: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement john.loughney
- Re: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Gary Kenward
- Re: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Gary Kenward
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- Re: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Gary Kenward
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Gary Kenward
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Gary Kenward
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- RE: [Seamoby] Proposal on Sync/NoSync Requirement Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1
- [Seamoby] Difficulty of Achieving Precision on Ce… James Kempf