[Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed

"Phil Neumiller" <pneumiller@meshnetworks.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 14:57 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA09875 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:57:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA03101; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:39:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA03070 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:39:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com ([205.245.27.196]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA09080 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neumillersimul (neumiller-simul.meshnetworks.com [10.0.0.98]) by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id C7800XQZ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:39:14 -0500
Message-ID: <003f01c19e9b$91d4b3c0$6200000a@meshnetworks.com>
From: Phil Neumiller <pneumiller@meshnetworks.com>
To: manet@itd.nrl.navy.mil, seamoby@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:39:14 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Seamoby] Terminology Draft Needed
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I have seen Charlie pull out the terminology draft at least a few times! :-)  Why can't 
some WG chair in SeaMoby or MANET adopt it as WG draft?

http://people.nokia.net/~charliep/txt/seamoby/term.txt

It seems that many times arguments are over terminology.  IMO, I would like to 
the SeaMoby WG become a bridge between MANET and MIP technologies, 
especially with respect to AR discovery and CT.  This terminology draft would make
a very nice addition to the SeaMoby WG draft list.  

Best regards,

Phil


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby