[Seamoby] CT Requirements Comments from IESG

I have finally managed to get a couple of technical comments out of the IESG on the CT requirements. More are coming but I think it
might be worthwhile to start discussing these.

1) The requirements say nothing about the maintenance of dynamic context. Something must be said, is this out of scope or what? Gary
tells me that supporting dynamic context was rejected by the working group, but it seems like we cannot punt on at least saying
something about this issue.

2) The requirements say nothing about context which must be modified on the new router in order to be useful. An example is ROHC
context when the mobile obtains a new care of address. How would the CT protocol handle this?

I've asked Gary to lead a discussion on these two issues, please send comments to the list.

            jak

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby