IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description

Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com> Thu, 17 January 2002 00:26 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24465 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:26:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA25844; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:13:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA25813 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:13:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from netmail2.alcatel.com (netmail2.alcatel.com [128.251.168.51]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24215 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:13:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from auds951.usa.alcatel.com (auds951.usa.alcatel.com [143.209.238.80]) by netmail2.alcatel.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA14201 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:12:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from alcatel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by auds951.usa.alcatel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g0H0CWs24755 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:12:32 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <3C4616E3.6060407@alcatel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:12:19 -0600
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
Organization: Alcatel USA
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Decision Description
References: <018c01c19ec7$6d761420$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <3C45E485.2010400@alcatel.com> <022701c19ed6$6646a3e0$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Several people not authors of proposals (Vijay, Rene) voiced their 
concern on the murky assessment, or am I wrong, or are you waiting for  
the sky to fall down?

To be on the positive side, we can offer Majordomo based mailing list 
support for the design team, if only with no WG draft.

Take it or leave it.

James Kempf wrote:

>
>Any such decision is always subject to WG concensus.
>Unfortunately, the only voice we are hearing on the mailing list
>right now is yours. One voice isn't enough for concensus, nor
>is text from a private email forwarded and posted apparently without the
>author's permission. Goodness knows, we have enough vocal
>people on this list. It took us a year to get CT requirements
>done (and we still don't have them in IESG Last Call!) because
>everybody had an opinion. If I were seeing some of these people, who
>were not authors of competing proposals coming forward and
>saying that we should change the decison, it would be another
>matter.
>
>                    jak
>

-- 
Behcet 




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status