IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 20 March 2014 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3A1A0912; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiFRAfaL9cRL; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8D81A0743; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w10so1234475pde.10 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=v24+VobgA3OnnBqz9SPgW5aOfNY1/7Ldu/lVFm4xBc4=; b=Nx0whxOkDsSLsNTtoP7nezDIgH8c+COU3myIUpcLsxcbqj7efVjjqvl4aVUrectv+o TKv6UaF3gz7PWNdcDrEnJYT58bmUQyUQuUJhG1HRpw2poUqfT8dnVI6eH2heb9oBfcsa zzEdvNAxx1pnqTJYhBdMHup3FudZRczP7WttdDuRwKw1B2fp8WkmLXQWMG8E/6e6Ardq ueUHET1uWw5t9WOUfVq1Bs1RJWCBuk4skwPA56Io1DtXC4KgKWLArc+gKf0qpsaDGHuG BFNvVXiOxQPElnRqrk3hv+6NUT55kL4QDSEdvzZ9Wyh35Ljpx3hauPVBZgqUmlNmeaaa 5gFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.196.202 with SMTP id io10mr26439093pbc.149.1395337179225; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.220.102 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLLNoMW=d0078kBOQw0vby-VW3q6A5EbEb9UtiVCk=jfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <187A7B1DA239514F9146FC78B19AADE30B6CAE6A@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com> <CAL0qLwYqNKmVH8ruEGBoh3A8h04hazda3X2q6ONuQHC4penTCQ@mail.gmail.com> <187A7B1DA239514F9146FC78B19AADE30B6CC737@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com> <CAL0qLwYNLuUfYCmwV8dnohZEu_yX9Z883dJoMeo+HPis027gDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLLNoMW=d0078kBOQw0vby-VW3q6A5EbEb9UtiVCk=jfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:39:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYLZ58icuUz2y8naHKNyGsqx6nDCs3Q5DGRXG_4jJy6Ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8fb208a6e8e34c04f50d40dc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/-633fETygopC338MqqwglITHnts
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:39:50 -0000

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>wrote:

>
> > I can't recall the exact reason why it's been said that RFC2119 language
> > ought not be used in Security Considerations (or similar) prose, or which
> > document's development cycle brought it up, but my general recollection
> is
> > that those words were intended to convey aspects of interoperability
> having
> > to do with protocol elements, and not otherwise.
>
> That's the silliest thing I've ever heard.[1]
>
> May I disabuse y'all of that idea forthwith?  Yes?  Good.  Thank you.
>
[...]
>

Given that Shaun's original comment identified these as nits: "What mighty
contests arise from trivial things."

I've made his changes in the next version, which I'll post after the
telechat unless you want them sooner.  The only other pending change is a
language tweak in IANA Considerations that came up during their review of
that section.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email