Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0B61296F9; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPmqAyZBXaXD; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9DF1296F6; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 83so112787807vkd.0; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jFZsA7YAof+oWKCbYgnR9iBWZ/C0r/5HNcySQmI7OVw=; b=MiHqlgovQ9sFxKyLwS2hfDmnpjD86ZsP5YIBRNRalnT79UkNp/HOBpHmDeixdaJVaA uCBNr4bf23uivsURB1bpvJHewzLNhqE3IuXzAA8qSo0YMKuookrjINmo1fiUKPI0G2kH LpcIL8fzXcqI0Kx4O7DZAwoxHCBUFRm33mkIymyE/QaCqCjpfWClLtIfO3cr6AImGyQa UPoUQMIAMJOdaLGa9bmS5OpWmLiBU7XkO2Ld6Y/KudDoqF7FTRGGhmNuO3f66HrZJrNT wYLLwJqE7BPbdZwjXFqkLjU6bjUhzRdCSaqitqaWgC2K5y1vT42PSogbTXFKbFzsKL81 9w4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jFZsA7YAof+oWKCbYgnR9iBWZ/C0r/5HNcySQmI7OVw=; b=OwjuGNYaJ1ABbZQF6mu85FcfA/VBuESUHWqBNUpBbqaO7nifa9x7mtJp5Z55yzljyd CAG/qoSHPKjbz7UzSPkKPI2M5BmsM+yW/vU8hKUnP2U+5k+8xUnbw2jPearGW0IYZjwr UD11I6z8ozMIIxXzkHvz/5o4ANSDy3Jg0kLcL76WIYvfmdh241/YqZyLbDQI+kN926Cm MuxkWsFhuLKOFTqvYZDSzeXOC4+c+lf0i2fY4Yk6eqKK0EfiFyKwO9AA+tu2pWFyvNWL 3JOu/0tvgek59Poj7N9WAXE3Fg0nm5HOLTvelfipdVBXX5EhqXFnznKBFnFMYsralJ9Y mwhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnOsq1dLa/GH05kitNyn2dRZkRTG5ksmmR4Wi5h33Sl8WzizDvn2MOZZNnMEDFQ1UGya3OYLYUWjNoJig== X-Received: by 10.31.92.22 with SMTP id q22mr12317658vkb.88.1476526472677; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.3.116 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 06:14:32 -0400 Message-ID: To: The IESG , secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension.all@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e61a2e7cead053ee49b2b Archived-At: Subject: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07 X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:14:35 -0000 --001a114e61a2e7cead053ee49b2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: *Ready* This is a Standard Track document that extend the GMPLS OSPF routing protocol by introducing an optional ISCD Availability sub-TLV, which could be used for route computation in a network that contains links with variable discrete bandwidth. This document defines the distribution mechanism for this new extension. The Security Consideration section clearly describes the security and privacy issues with this new extension, and since this is only an extension to an existing mechanism, it points to other documents that cover the mechanism and the security implications and potential solutions. Regards, Rifaat --001a114e61a2e7cead053ee49b2b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have reviewed this docum= ent as part of the security directorate's=C2=A0ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the= =C2=A0IESG.=C2=A0 These comments we= re written primarily for the benefit of the=C2=A0security area directors.=C2=A0 Document editors and WG chairs= should treat=C2=A0these comments j= ust like any other last call comments.

Summary:=C2=A0Ready

This is a Standard Track document that extend the GMPLS OSPF routing = protocol by introducing an optional ISCD A= vailability sub-TLV, which could be used for route computation in a network= that contains links with variable discrete bandwidth. This document define= s the distribution mechanism for this new extension.

The Security = Consideration section clearly describes the security and privacy issues wit= h this new extension, and since this is only an extension to an existing me= chanism, it points to other documents that cover the mechanism and the secu= rity implications and potential solutions.

Regards,
=C2=A0Rifaat
--001a114e61a2e7cead053ee49b2b--