[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04

"Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@hyperthought.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B424521F87D4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:14:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZPF+KV11nrx for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp112.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp112.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1955921F85C8 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp51.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8D6FE20735; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:14:44 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: from legacy14.wa-web.iad1a (legacy14.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.4.100]) by smtp51.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9521E2069D; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:14:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hyperthought.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by legacy14.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C392630001; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:14:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: scott@hyperthought.com, from: scott@hyperthought.com) with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:14:42 -0800 (PST)
From: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com>
To: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: plain
Message-ID: <1358446482.458815115@apps.rackspace.com>
X-Mailer: webmail7.0
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:14:45 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes a modification to the SRTP protocol, wherein header fields which have previously only been protected with authentication may now also be protected with (authenticated) encryption. The document is detailed and well-written, and the document text, together with the security considerations section, seems to address all relevant concerns.

I want to qualify my comments: I had relatively short notice for this document review, I have no prior experience with SRTP, and I have been very busy with post-Holiday catch-up, so I have to apologize for not giving this document more attention. On the other hand, there are a number of highly respected reviewers mentioned in the acknowledgements section, so I think odds are good that this document raises no serious concerns.

--Scott