IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working group? Was: Re: ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts

Uri Blumenthal <uri@mit.edu> Sun, 17 March 2019 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <uri@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F50129A87 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dmXb8C1aUk3m for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu [18.9.28.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCD41275E9 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x2HCAnff006813; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:10:51 -0400
Received: from W92EXHUB11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.20) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:10:26 -0400
Received: from OC11EXPO28.exchange.mit.edu ([169.254.1.251]) by W92EXHUB11.exchange.mit.edu ([18.7.73.20]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:10:40 -0400
From: Uri Blumenthal <uri@mit.edu>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
CC: Paterson Kenneth <kenny.paterson@inf.ethz.ch>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Thread-Topic: [secdir] [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working group? Was: Re: ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
Thread-Index: AQHU15pu4C8HN59tNkSSeRcv6kg8BqYGRgAAgAJYfQCAAB29AIAA+HCAgAOftgCAARanAIABb3+AgAAuMwA=
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:10:40 +0000
Message-ID: <679B6759-5AD3-4F28-9EF4-8794F383468B@mit.edu>
References: <1d8de489fc976b63a911573300a431d4.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903081227200.30421@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHOTMVLtjVxZNy3bFRn09xH+cOw+tPi2CL3BkaQuJEqxAzGOJg@mail.gmail.com> <edca701b-21f3-c80c-d754-fc333f1e2e04@cs.tcd.ie> <20190310182935.GE8182@kduck.mit.edu> <B876B124-7EDE-4E20-A878-3AAD3FA074BC@krovetz.net> <20190310191026.GF8182@kduck.mit.edu> <CAHOTMVJcosEgYV9caWapgyzQfh-g4k5DQry5n42bEfrkJvmdWQ@mail.gmail.com> <042b3f13-7d5a-12d7-e604-9f8cad197608@cs.tcd.ie> <CANeU+ZCmiTKfE1_YgjM6GX9ZCw_35mZoT8M-6VL72UhbenT2og@mail.gmail.com> <3FA4B2DD-334E-4C7C-A01E-6C370CAE4C00@ll.mit.edu> <2935C6E3-3AE8-4447-BA01-8DAE0410E5C6@ericsson.com> <CAL02cgSeCgAOOh3oMhJZqCGvT0F=JQ6n-bmgWYU=6hxkV+aOHQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d38eabd-6f90-2d19-3b45-f1ce19ba9b73@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgRVXn2U3SKhGh6biTZJKmHM6KrW6D_rVB2-ZTC5Oohh4w@mail.gmail.com> <829ca608-8d47-083e-e0a6-e7276525b080@nthpermutation.com> <5FAC333B-38EF-4F58-89FB-3DF3F774DD2C@inf.ethz.ch> <F6A7941E-17AD-4525-905B-B76E09D8E780@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <F6A7941E-17AD-4525-905B-B76E09D8E780@nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-6CD442D2-EDB4-4C56-89D6-4FA7193ADF8D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/-p5fKyPNl9TUvxwuHfCrssRVX-w>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working group? Was: Re: ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:10:50 -0000

If CFRG is doing what a WG is supposed to - what's the product is supposed to produce, what are the milestones, and when is it supposed to wind down, as any normal WG should when it's done the job it was chartered for?

Sent from my test iPhone

> On Mar 17, 2019, at 05:25, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> On Mar 16, 2019, at 12:30, Paterson Kenneth <kenny.paterson@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> 
>> The rough consensus of those who joined the discussion is that we should leave the status of CFRG as it is for now. 
> 
> I wasn’t aware we were gathering consensus already and thought we were just having a discussion. So seeing this cut short all of a sudden with a tally seems wrong to me.
> 
> So for consensus, I think that what CFRG is doing matches a WG more than an RG, and it would be more formally correct to change it.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email