Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Tue, 17 May 2016 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3385C12D8AC; Tue, 17 May 2016 05:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-OBk48gECbn; Tue, 17 May 2016 05:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5E812D8AB; Tue, 17 May 2016 05:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4HC80Qs019936 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 May 2016 15:08:00 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.2/8.14.8/Submit) id u4HC80Kq026135; Tue, 17 May 2016 15:08:00 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22331.2463.998319.871791@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:07:59 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
In-Reply-To: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF8DAD9B@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
References: <22304.47475.765923.579337@fireball.acr.fi> <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF8DAD9B@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 3 min
X-Total-Time: 4 min
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/0bUpeZLbQ9jLCB1RizWaDpxp6TI>
Cc: "draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines.all@tools.ietf.org>, "Mirja Kuehlewind \(IETF\)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:08:05 -0000

Kuhn Nicolas writes:
> Thanks a lot for your review. If you believe that your proposed
> changes on the references format should deserve changes in the
> document and a new ID, please let us know, we would try to integrate
> them ASAP.  

Current format makes the document hard to read, especially for those
who do are not very familiar with the area, as it is hard to remember
which rfc is which (7567, 5481, 2679 etc)

My recommendation would be to fix that, but this is my personal
preference on the matter.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi