Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 18 February 2019 02:50 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63070130EB0; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:50:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.018, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8j3k4VlceiT; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-f172.google.com (mail-it1-f172.google.com [209.85.166.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8391295EC; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-f172.google.com with SMTP id v72so37794428itc.0; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:50:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LHcW7m2wXwLEhfRAGn+AQFU0tth+BeA+GO7qytfa5Ag=; b=XT2gwsYReH4MJ3oPpjUXalVzITEZ5YhuHN3PNykj/pj1bHjbsTVXLiD85G/jW8BILL QSTtyxaY2A6YKPJ9RGp7t/+EwStrisAFptSBH0f4TlQWZVsMp92dSTaOkcQ6H9cleY2t YygMuRk9uFcQwV78lergmyg8WMVlsVe2ApylmBh1uX/ADn/RzjDwpN6phRc6EXaIO+iA aDzEB99v6Eh/jo/L5BAEm9bEjOIgDlKxkLQioeGMO9sj0GIwloQecrVDv4EQFf2HV9eR oeqqHVEq6/uUad/iUcTtTzuXSU6XZcj95GlwyhtPsgXV5oT/NWbJGW+z71nw7yyRe3fL ql2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYUS3GydyQuWk/F6LL1aG8lSkco7nvYvI7ljEAiUx70cZ0V3HyZ V6CxDI0ZroUJFX8WRFhQvTLWMAEG0ZMaUcSgRHo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYLcgrdw1pimIWaqcdsW6sFG+BHYc2M3feEvgNKtfdV8N66HTK3Z+PfPna15SI1V1Po56drVRK2rrmOysfHPts=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:dd8d:: with SMTP id t135mr10119975itf.84.1550458216577; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:50:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154886569351.10484.4703007670359734409@ietfa.amsl.com> <B1723A6E-2CA3-40D4-8C61-2BF41C3C3FB2@mnot.net> <CAHbuEH5ucn6E9iyOi9TaJRNxE+n7V7=qYT3LTtYqvXrq4BvSfQ@mail.gmail.com> <1317558B-24DD-4CB7-BBB6-95E5946EF87A@mnot.net> <CALaySJK7y+v2XSFg5xh0=uk03J-wjPsWpTMRFMTYZcxY59+5Fw@mail.gmail.com> <AE45E283-0DC6-45BD-B4B5-3AA17A057896@mnot.net> <CALaySJJD-thi6Omg--Kq_26mdSXpj2=r7WR32H=7Ekx_UgRhrw@mail.gmail.com> <79B2F684-4CD4-4715-AED0-5D5A6E1DC612@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <79B2F684-4CD4-4715-AED0-5D5A6E1DC612@mnot.net>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:50:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJK07hnp64M7okiC-D+_spAObF6KVWOMaNzJvrFVRM9KwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF SecDir <secdir@ietf.org>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/0cezTPJk-mrnv0oPsn_7o1PqQCg>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 02:50:20 -0000
> Because, by the time this becomes an RFC, I (the expert of the registry, IESG still willing), will > work with IANA to get that set up. Probably during AUTH48. It would be nice if that were already done, but I'm good with that assurance. Kathleen? b
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-notting… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-not… Julian Reschke