Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt
Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Fri, 01 February 2013 15:26 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A108321E8041; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:26:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkOxhs786y2w; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (mail2.ihtfp.org [IPv6:2001:4830:143:1::3a11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7008C21E803D; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625252602B1; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:26:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15126-06; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:26:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (unknown [IPv6:fe80::224:d7ff:fee7:8924]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC8A260211; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:26:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r11FQMbo019399; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:26:22 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@ericsson.com>
References: <sjmwqutovqp.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org> <6BCE198E4EAEFC4CAB45D75826EFB0760869A2@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:26:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <6BCE198E4EAEFC4CAB45D75826EFB0760869A2@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> (Joel Halpern's message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:14:56 +0000")
Message-ID: <sjmk3qsoy1u.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "chuanhuang_li@zjsu.edu.cn" <chuanhuang_li@zjsu.edu.cn>, "ehalep@ece.upatras.gr" <ehalep@ece.upatras.gr>, "forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "wmwang@zjsu.edu.cn" <wmwang@zjsu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:26:43 -0000
Yes, I think that would improve it. I don't think you need more. Thanks! -derek Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@ericsson.com> writes: > Would a pointer to 5810 (the ForCES Protocol RFC, which defines how these things are manipulated) help? > The LFBs here are not different from any other LFBs which affect device behavior. Yes, manipulating them can cause problems. That's why the protocol has security mechanisms. > (I probably should have caught that and made sure there was such a reference.) > Do we need more than that? > > Yours, > Joel > > -----Original Message----- >> From: Derek Atkins [mailto:derek@ihtfp.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:04 PM >> To: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org >> Cc: forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org; wmwang@zjsu.edu.cn; >> ehalep@ece.upatras.gr; ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp; >> chuanhuang_li@zjsu.edu.cn; Joel Halpern >> Subject: sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt >> >> Hi, >> >> I have reviewed this document as part of the security >> directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents >> being processed by the IESG. These comments were written >> primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. >> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments >> just like any other last call comments. >> >> This document defines basic classes of Logical Function >> Blocks (LFBs) >> used in the Forwarding and Control Element Separation >> (ForCES). The >> basic LFB classes are defined according to ForCES FE model >> and ForCES >> protocol specifications, and are scoped to meet requirements of >> typical router functions and considered as the basic LFB >> library for >> ForCES. The library includes the descriptions of the LFBs and the >> XML definitions. >> >> The Security Considerations section offloads itself to RFC3746. >> >> It is unclear to me if any of the new functions defined in >> the LFB need any additional authentication or authorization, >> and if so I do not see how that would be added. >> >> -derek >> >> -- >> Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 >> derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com >> Computer and Internet Security Consultant >> > -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-… Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-… Joel Halpern
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-… Derek Atkins