[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36

Catherine Meadows via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 02 August 2019 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5273120168; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Catherine Meadows via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis.all@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Catherine Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil>
Message-ID: <156478165290.20958.13051270492203409535@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:34:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/0zEaauYK0yEMggAfgkoym4J05h4>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:34:13 -0000

Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
Review result: Ready

 I generated this review of this document as part
of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF
documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written
with the intent of improving security requirements and considerations
in IETF drafts.  Comments not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document updates RFC4566 on the Session Description Protocol, SDP.  The
Security Considerations Section is well-written and well-thought out, and it
updates the RFC4566 security considerations when appropriate.  I consider this
document READY.