[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-sig-04

Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 22 October 2019 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673F120859; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cose-hash-sig.all@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.107.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <157175673652.3089.14383037666901135010@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:05:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/116j1hVR1UlR1camBR6lA4Qru5s>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-sig-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:05:44 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

This document is ready for publication as Proposed Standard RFC.

This document specifies conventions for using the HSS/MLS hash-based signature
algorithm with COSE. It is straightforward, but relies strongly on its
normative references. It adds entries to two registries.