Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1628012D93B for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTO188rDDXl3 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5986212D68B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j203so27755200oih.2 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wajsYqueQ+PBhsOOgeHkKIhJGBu+ta4koookhnNR5kg=; b=bCQDYd76CRZfdT1cDs3cqK3hHL7niFEzJaulRr/zF4wMGTr7luM6gnD8EDLvypaY8Z sdYUscsjHkK5UgS38tTbTRQl523Pvv4hBZ4ytvLQw9U6p35Ddc28aAnGnoCnQMvbKB8t 9HFDF1yV8n16Btht7DmCQQ8dsVB6CfTSBxxtD2Z8pm70pnKPNfmN08XWMhyUrLwZXdYF DplVomkPYj2zEmj7M2ctfn24dK4/h05pKLEdOKD2TYUgT5Y21WjlfXkiePetSw4RldqA VugYYCAlLsfLxBC2pfizALzkt/mm1P1HqGoPP+PhfjS9PmM8SZn1qYXdDOM+J7ye2yNS tUWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wajsYqueQ+PBhsOOgeHkKIhJGBu+ta4koookhnNR5kg=; b=MC9DEpKgVVyTgLC8Jq++BG6+mdN4nQS25PYdA4tptqX6BMd1IP5I89QUyPwcjkhVMw csFwZGxou9MDF/S14InvHqtFi/BXhQdOhILfcLhCLJ631KN1rNvoKp2nltKNWCT69Pqu 9ird2jjwmkWR35gjZeR/n5/9FysjdOxitUiJ306Q+3Cr0BlhP7eqjaI3kgqrKoCwguau kV1/npET4PripKz+1SYsWme5tGCudPftJoLI0SA13uu/IaxLvEZMPyC81Jl/gHPqpzKk pCRapIGoZTjvAgL+xA16B7/UGwL8nsC9U9SF2uy/Wwlrsw4NLt4GydaZP70Q0XQUFYEz g+EQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO+vLYYwXRPkLeddBAPBjCk4BFG+roIF4SHEqmuD5mlIZG4J/CSo/JiOP2pLZ9LXvS1MMOMewnsL3laUA==
X-Received: by 10.157.14.84 with SMTP id n20mr1938013otd.55.1472566910780; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.138.35 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3413ce55-8a13-9698-5985-7fecc8c8f038@oracle.com>
References: <5770C231.9060301@oracle.com> <3413ce55-8a13-9698-5985-7fecc8c8f038@oracle.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:21:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0FJnU7az+4Oqrrv6+24oAaN-vwEDz=hbCkDNoyCmmU5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113db5e8a02e55053b4ab3cd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/1FasZqTjcN8TnbrvMcBpHqsBefI>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:25:28 -0000

Shawn,

Many thanks for your review. We’ll fix the editorial comment. Regarding LSP
stitching, this is well known to MPLS experts, but you’re right, this
should be referenced. RFC 6424, which we already have in the references, is
an excellent reference for LSP stitching and using LSP Ping and Traceroute
over stitched LSPs. We’ll add [RFC6424] in the appropriate locations.

Thanks again,
Andy


On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
> area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft specifies multipath support in environments where Entropy Labels
> (ELs) are used so that Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute
> operations are possible.
>
> The security considerations section does exist and refers to the security
> considerations in base specifications for applicability.  The sections
> continues that there are no new security considerations with
> this specification.  I agree with this assertion.
>
> General comments:
>
> None.
>
> Editorial comments:
>
> s/initiator to not be able to/initiator that is unable to/
>
> "LSPs stitched together": not for sure what "stitched" means and wasn't
> defined in the Terminology section.
>
> Shawn.
> --
>
>