[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09

"Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26012DB50; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvSyJClrlC92; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB29E12DB39; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1012; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466199160; x=1467408760; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Z06EVqGO/IT1tdvMVxBJZV1NonYCf/zGlfhLix+MglM=; b=ilHWDvBeKHbmzBvLQaGRnC5lgfLMAhAxPoFOonPyGISx8fjyTcdTL/7j QLobdbLQ+4g6ZwGBZUo44dlLs+frAtJ1I28Rf9LT/Qobo4RXvwAR+I4uN 3zMto05vAtPKD9oXux2z0urOZ+CPxlnO1/lmtMFebYlUswuXOyFmTzDHn 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0COBQAlbGRX/4UNJK1dgz6BWbsZgXqGF?= =?us-ascii?q?4EnOhIBAQEBAQEBZSeEUjo/EgE+QicEAQ2INcB5AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAR6IHopCgi8FmHUBgTCMeY8ij3YBJQEug3CKN38BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,485,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="114169947"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Jun 2016 21:32:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5HLWdI4011985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:32:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:32:38 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:32:38 -0400
From: "Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09
Thread-Index: AQHRyN/FSjlY5rBOrki9mgn+ezADWw==
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:32:38 +0000
Message-ID: <060C987D-B171-479E-9A60-A37E2DF63759@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.210.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1FA7DDFFCA79A745821134DBC9FC0F19@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/1ID05fviLSotE-jg7OYsV8Cq6ec>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mile-implementreport.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-implementreport.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:32:42 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft is a collection of implementation reports of several RFCs in the IETF INCident Handling (INCH) and Management Incident Lightweight Exchange (MILE) working groups. The reports include implementation of tools to create and consume security incident reports and security incident objects. It includes a summary of each implementation, and an Implementation Guide. The document does not define any new protocols, or make any new requirements on the incident report and incident objects.

The Security Considerations section states that there are no security considerations, and I concur. I consider the document Ready to publish.

Brian