IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13

David Mandelberg <david+work@mandelberg.org> Thu, 29 March 2018 04:27 UTC

Return-Path: <david+work@mandelberg.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC12126C0F for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XT8718ny7zQB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A91124B0A for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X_CMAE_Category: , ,
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=WbdOUApX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:117 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=NTnny0joGdQA:10 a=v2DPQv5-lfwA:10 a=bmmO2AaSJ7QA:10 a=BTUBnpS-AAAA:8 a=t4eUvFSQmwmfZqTOtOgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pblkFgjdBCuYZ9-HdJ6i:22
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username: ZHNlb21uQHJjbi5jb20=
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=david+work@mandelberg.org; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=david+work@mandelberg.org; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=dseomn@rcn.com; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.43.168 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mandelberg.org)
Received: from [209.6.43.168] ([209.6.43.168:44252] helo=uriel.mandelberg.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from <david+work@mandelberg.org>) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 4A/80-03546-41B6CBA5; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:27:00 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.152] (DD-WRT [192.168.1.1]) by uriel.mandelberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E34651C609C; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <3b7c6cdc-0e9e-0a57-e030-ae3a715c6a03@mandelberg.org> <e32e5f9bc00043e3a8b86205d434c35d@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <56ce2942-388f-d03b-721a-3b06af5559bc@mandelberg.org> <ef5efa3a9f1d434580946f1012ebb0bc@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <9521bc0e-a1f2-046e-8e92-9e4a64237036@mandelberg.org> <d259d31119534e76b1ebf45faab43941@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <894918aa-b853-299c-38f4-6c56ce385c64@mandelberg.org> <20180326153348.GE44086@kduck.kaduk.org> <d0274470-5737-57f4-1d16-0631f386403c@mandelberg.org> <23228.2906.789875.266549@fireball.acr.fi> <20180329004632.GM76724@kduck.kaduk.org>
From: David Mandelberg <david+work@mandelberg.org>
Organization: David Mandelberg, LLC
Message-ID: <6df7eedf-530f-91c4-05bf-8b514ec661c1@mandelberg.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:26:57 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180329004632.GM76724@kduck.kaduk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/2P8gufkZ6zE6VD8Rzr3VZi5oKmA>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:27:04 -0000

On 03/28/2018 08:46 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi Tero,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:38:34AM +0300, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>>
>> "Correct review" is meant to be used when you want to correct some
>> mistke in your review. For example link points to wrong location or
>> version does not match.
>>
>> You can also use it to fix the "review summary" if it is incorrect for
>> some reason, but it is not really meant to be used to mark whether the
>> discussion triggered by the review caused the issues to be fixed.
>> I.e., if the issues found in review are fixed, you do not edit the
>> review, but simply reply to the review thread in mailing lists saying
>> that "Yes, this solves my issues" or similar, so when ADs check the
>> thread they will see that as final email in the thread and know that
>> issues have been solved.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification!

Ditto. Should I change the link and status back to what they were before?

-- 
Freelance cyber security consultant, software developer, and more
https://david.mandelberg.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email